III. SUPERFICIAL RESEARCH vs. GENUINE RESEARCH
Many students believe that doing research means copying facts and
quotes from various sources, reorganizing and paraphrasing that
information, typing it up, and calling it “research.”
This superficial approach to research merely reports
and summarizes what is already known, and goes no further. Genuine
bibliographic research, however, is a far more creative and challenging
process.
You are doing genuine research – i.e. not
merely summarizing what is already known -- when your research aims
to answer a unique, appropriately narrowed research question.
In other words, the key to doing authentic research is to find something
that you think is worth investigating, put it in the form of a question,
and make that the focus of your research.
Let’s take an example. You’ve been assigned to write
a paper on the problem of homelessness in America. A superficial
(and boring!) approach to this topic would be to find a lot of statistics
and quotes about homelessness, incorporate them into your essay,
and conclude your paper by saying, “Clearly, the problem of
homeless must be addressed.” Nothing new or interesting would
be discovered or put forth with this approach, and it would be uninspiring
for you to write and for your professor to read.
You could, however, conduct genuine research into this subject
by formulating an interesting research question and making that
your focus. Here’s one possibility: “How do programs
that require homeless persons to enroll in rehabilitation and job
training affect homeless rates in American cities?”
With a solid research question in mind, you begin gathering information
from a variety of sources. You will uncover different ideas and
perspectives, which you must analyze, compare, and evaluate. You
read what others have written because their writings inform, strengthen,
complement, or challenge your own ideas. By the end of the process,
you should be able to present your own evaluative perspective
– your own informed opinion. Although no
instructor will expect you to become a world-renown expert on a
topic or settle a long-running debate, you will be expected to show
original thinking in your thesis statement, discussion, and conclusion.
The table below summarizes the differences between superficial
and genuine research:
SUPERFICIAL RESEARCH
|
GENUINE RESEARCH |
- No unique research question formulated
- Random copying of facts and quotes
- Merely rewriting and paraphrasing information
- Overly general, very broad survey of a subject
- Lack of depth and analysis
- No attempt to present a unique look at a topic
- No evaluative perspective or informed opinion
- Summarizing what is already known
|
- Research is focused on a unique,
personally interesting, appropriately
narrowed, research question
- Facts, quotes and other information
gathered informs, complements,
strengthens, or challenges your own ideas
- Presents an evaluative perspective
and/or an informed opinion on the research question
- An honest attempt at contributing something, fresh, unique
and exciting
|
|